|
|
ARTICLES |
|
|
|
|
The Technical Solutions of Base Elements
of
New Generation Optical Networks
Stimulus
and Directions of Development
of
New Generation Optical Networks
In the history of
technical development it is difficult to find branches in which
development
has occurred as rapidly as optical fiber communication during the approach and
beginning of the third millennium. The progress in electrical communication,
including Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) and electrical routing, more or
less followed Moor’s law. According to this law, the engineering of computer
productivity was increased twice and the price decreased twice every 18
months. The development of optical fiber technology has exceeded this rate.
The speed of transfer on each spent dollar was increased twice every 9 months,
and speed of transfer on each used wavelength was doubled every 12 months.
According to statistics, the throughput of optical fiber networks in 2001 was
doubled every 5 months. Now the transfer of 160 channels with 10 Gbit/sec each
is perceived almost as usual business. Today experimental systems
are able to transfer 80 Gbit/sec on each channel. With this speed, 160
channels can transfer 12.8 Tbit per second. That considerably exceeds the
bandpass of all telephone networks existing in the world.
From the economic point of
view, extraordinary progress also is observed. The cost of transferring one
bit of information falls by a factor of two every nine months. And the cost of
long distance transfer of one bit today has decreased by more than a factor of
four in comparison with 1996. Thus the price of a basic element of optical
networks, optical fiber (in Mbit/sec), fell approximately 60% annually.
What is the stimulus for
the further development of optical fiber networks?
The introduction of the Internet
dramatically changed the way in which information was handled. Today the
industrial world is at the beginning of an era of ubiquitous broadband systems
of communication. The growth of the traffic is mainly caused by traditional
needs: by transfer of music, photo images, video, and sharing of applied files
and programs. The next sharp growth of traffic led us to expect distribution
of new services that require rather wide bandpass, such as broadcasting, TV,
transfer of images, and video in high and superhigh resolution, etc. Such
services, requiring 20 to 300 Mbit/sec of channel access, will be the reason
for the increasing distribution FTTH. Already, as a result of the decrease of
network costs, FTTH has become an alternative to DSL and broadband services
provided via cable modem. Herewith optimized for voice, data, and video, the
FTTH offers speeds of data transfer, 10/100 Ethernet, scaled to Gigabit
Ethernet or higher using the standard Data
Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS)
to ensure safety. According to researches of Dittberner
Associates,
investments by the world community in FTTX during the ten year period 2004 to
2013 will increase from $3.7 billion in 2004 to $22.8 billion in 2013. This
six-time increase basically is required by Asian and Pacific Ocean regions
(52.8 % investments of the world market), while the advanced regions of Europe
and North America will each invest about $4 billion in 2013 by FTTX
(Figure 1).
Figure
1. Annual investments on average, over the period (2004 – 2013), will be: in Europe about $300 million, North America $300 million, and Asian and Pacific regions about 1.1billion. These impressive sums will occur only in the optical access networks.
There are other reasons
for the potential growth of the traffic on optical fiber networks. It is
widely known what runaway growth is occurring now in the field of cellular
communication. Wireless technology is a good solution that is a profitable and
quickly realizable method for connecting houses and small businesses. However,
wireless is limited in distance and capacity. Also there are challenges
concerning reliability and data protection. The use of optical fibers on some
sectors of cellular networks solves these problems. For example, connecting a
base station of a cellular network using the standard WIMAX (Worldwide
Interoperability for Microwave Access) with an optical regional network using
fiber is a promising solution. It is the opinion of some experts that such
hybrid systems seem to be promising not only technically but also in economic
terms. It is difficult to predict whether this addition (optical fiber
networks) to wireless access networks will be great, since they are in a stage
of a competition rather than of integration. Nevertheless it is possible to
expect the occurrence of one more “source” which increases the traffic on
optical fiber networks.
Thus, fast growth of the
traffic will require inevitable changes in the transport infrastructure. This
change should ensure substantial growth of throughput capacity of networks,
and they also should have universality, scalability, and ease of integration.
This wide spectrum of requirements is now reached by use of several
technologies.
Traditional providers
offering TDM, ATM and IP services usually use four-level networks: IP, ATM,
SONET/SDH and WDM. This solution is not optimal.
The two-level model of a network, IP over WDM (IP by means of WDM) is
considered preferable. Experts and developers consider IP over WDM as a
preferred technology of the next generation of optical networks for the
several reasons:
IP technology is
attractive for such properties as scalability, ability to integrate other
network technologies, reliability and ease of debugging.
The existence of the Internet and its role in our modern community speaks well
about expediency of applying IP technology. The efforts of the network
technology developers have been concentrated on improving the properties of
the stack of TCP/IP
protocols. The manufacturers of the equipment actively build the products to
support IP. The operators of communication services make powerful investments
in creating IP-trunks. The enterprises use IP for interconnecting their
division networks through global networks and for providing remote access for
their employees. This domination of IP makes
it obvious that in engineering practice the infrastructure of a network should
be optimized for IP.
On the other hand, WDM is the most
promising technology. It offers huge network throughput capacity, which
requires continued growth of traffic. The WDM technology becomes more and more
attractive with the decrease of WDM systems cost. Based on WDM, technology
develops not only in backbone networks, but also in regional, urban networks
and in access networks. Furthermore, WDM networks, originally used only Peer-to-Peer
networks, today correspond to the high level of
requirements for flexibility of a network. An ordinary system uses a separate
channel of management DCN (Data Communication Network) to transfer signals of
management and control of a WDM-network. This control system, according to the
concept of TMN (Telecommunication Management Network), is carried out under a
centralized scheme. To realize scalability, a hierarchy of management is used.
Uniting IP and WDM it is possible to use the resources of a WDM network for
effectively directing IP traffic and creating a unified plane of management
(apparently IP-centralized) through IP and WDM-networks. As a result, the
network infrastructure appears more effective from the economic point of view
and thus able to transport huge volumes of heterogeneous traffic. It includes
only the transport layer (photonic) and the service layer.
All-optical
Routers
For the creation and
management of unified transport services, it is necessary to have a link
uniting these two network levels. For that we can consider using protocol MPlS
(Multiprotocol Lambda Switching) also known as GMPLS (Generalized
Multiprotocol Label Switching), based on wide application of the standard MPLS
(Multiprotocol Label Switching). The MPLS technology can be used with any
network protocol: IP, ATM, PPP, etc. The protocol MPLS simplifies the process
of routing and increases productivity. The routing MPLS is used for the
formation of virtual paths, LSP (Label Switched Path), in IP-networks. An
MPLS-router, also called LSR (Label Switching Router), works like this:
A packet, that comes from
the periphery of an MPLS network is accepted by the first router. On the basis
of the packet’s IP-address, the router makes a decision about the packet’s
direction, determines the label's meaning (according to a class of equivalence
of the packet’s progress), attaches a label to the packet, and transfers it
to the following router. The following LSR determines the next step, attaches
a new label to the packet and sends it to the next router. For each packet,
the entrance LSR writes a label separate from the heading of the third level.
This label contains the address information and information about the class of
service. Therefore it is not necessary to process each packet on every
intermediate router. The header of the third level of a packet is read only on
the entrance and the exit of the domain. Hence, routers carry out a smaller
volume of work, which means there is an increase of network productivity.
Like switching on a label
in an LSR optical router, OLSR switches radiation of different wave- lengths
from entrance port to exit port. They use a wavelength as a label for creating
an OLSP (Optical Label Switched Path). There are two approaches for creating a
label on a wavelength. In the first approach one wavelength is used on all
parts of the OLSP from the entrance router to the exit router. In the second
approach the wavelength is replaced on each router along the path.
In MPLS technology the
label is assigned to each packet by the entrance router. Then the label
changes on every subsequent router. As in GMPLS technology, a label (a
wavelength) joins a flow of bits on the entrance router and each IP packet
will be accommodated in the OLSP. The main difference between MPLS and GMPLS
is that MPLS can unite labels, where two or more LSPs are combined in an
intermediate router in one path, when these two (or more) LSPs follow that
route; GMPLS does not allow labels to be united.
All-optical routers (or
wavelength routers) are expected to become the dominant solution in
future optical networks. In its structure it is possible to allocate
three basic parts: input/output
system, optical switch matrix, and network element management system.
The circuit of one variant of an all-optical router is shown in Figure
2.
Figure
2.
The input/output system
provides the access to the optical switch matrix through standard optical
interfaces. There are two types of optical interface standards: one-wave and
multiwave. One-wave standards are applied in local ports that are connected to
the source of the traffic and to the equipment (ATM-switch, SONET/SDH
equipment, IP-routers), processing it. The multiwave interfaces are used in
ports of paths ensuring pass through of WDM multiplexers and WDM
demultiplexers. The input/output system is also responsible for wavelength
transformation. It can include
optical amplifiers that are required in some optical routers. The network management system includes an all-optical non-blocking system of wave routing that manages the switching matrix. The router switches waves of various lengths transparently and does not care about framing and signal regeneration, which could make a network much more complicated. The algorithm of the protocol of the wave routing system is made that way so that every router will “know” the topology of the network. In addition to the information about the connection’s condition, the router should have the information about the resource change so that it can assign the optimal route. In this connection, the routing is based on the protocol of links condition OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) and protocol IS-IS (Intermediate System to Intermediate System). The system of wave routing uses two types of signaling. The first is applied to information interchange between routers as well as between working protocols. The second is used between a switching matrix and a system of wave routing for managing the process of locally switching waves. The system of wave routing also calculates alternative paths for hybrid topology.
Let's consider the
wavelength transformation that plays an essential role in an optical cross-switch.
If the
transformation of wavelengths is absent, the
same wavelength is assigned to the entire OLSP,
which takes
place through the
network. Conflicts of wavelengths on some parts
of an OLSP are
possible in
this case. That
limits
the network's
efficiency. Applying transformation of wavelengths on different parts
of the OLSP between routers,
diferent wavelengths
can be assigned. This excludes conflicts, raises efficiency of using
all lengths of waves and, hence, raises efficiency of the network.
Two types of wave
converters exist: optical-electrical
wave converters
and all-optical
wave converters. The application of optical-electrical
wavelength
converters in WDM cross-switching,
in order to prevent crosstalk
between channels, requires complex configuration that raises
the price of
routers and makes them
less attractive. Therefore, all-optical
wave converters are
considered more attractive. In
all-optical wave converters the transformation is carried out by using the
effect of cross-modulation of wavelengths in an active medium or by using
wavelength mixing in a nonlinear medium.
The cross-modulation of
waves can be observed in a semi-conductor amplifier in two modes: cross-gain modulation
and cross-phase
modulation. In the first mode,
the modulated optical signal of a wavelength to
be converted, and a
continuous optical radiation (the pump
radiation) wavelength
(to transform the
signal) enter
the input
of the semi-conductor amplifier. The
modulated signal
modulates the gain
of the semi-conductor amplifier due to the
effect of saturation. The radiation of the required wavelength becomes
modulated opposite in
phase of
the input signal. At the
output of the amplifier a filter passes this radiation and blocks the
radiation with the wavelength of the
input
signal.
In cross-phase
modulation mode, the conversion of wavelengths
is based on the phenomenon that the
index of
refraction of an active medium
depends upon the density of the radiation, passing through the medium. The
change of
the index of
refraction results in a change of radiation
phase. The converter in a cross-phase
modulation mode usually operates like an interferometer
such as an
asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer,
which has two semi-conductor amplifiers in
opposing legs.
Converters that are based
on the wave mixing effect, use the product of nonlinear transformation of
several optical wavelengths in a nonlinear optical medium. The intensity
and the length
of the
output waves
depend on the intensity
and wavelengths of the input waves (initial radiation). These
converters keep the information at about the
phase and the
amplitude of the initial radiation and also allow simultaneous converting of
some wavelengths. Four-Wave
Mixing
is an example of the phenomenon of wave
mixing. This
category of converters also uses the generation of waves, which are
a consequence of nonlinear transformation of the second power in a medium
with two wavelengths:
the signal and
the pump.
This method does not add excess noise to the
signal or in the transformed
signal, but requires additional attention to phasing cooperating radiations
and the use of fibers with very low attenuation.
Comparing all-optical
converters of wavelengths to the requirements of the present time, the most
suitable are converters that apply cross-modulation. However, more promising
are the converters ensuring simultaneous transformation of several
wavelengths.
Optical switches of
channels (waves of various length) can be divided into two groups:
Switches that transform
the optical signal into an electrical signal, perform the switching, and then
transform the signal back to optical (O-E-O);
Switches that are known as
all-optical switches in which switching is made optically.
All-optical switches
are considered more promising
for application in all-optical networks, in spite of the fact that now some of
their parameters are worse than the same parameters of O-E-O switches.
They are based on various technologies and effects.
All-optical
switches
can be switches that: ·
use
optical semi-conductor amplifiers ·
are
based on the application of integrated optics ·
use
thermo-optical effect ·
are
electro-optical ·
are
electro-mechanical
High requirements are
demanded of all-optical switches. These are the basic difficulties of creating
all-optical switches: ·
the
switching time ·
the
characteristics of transfer (loss, cross-talk, independence of wavelength) the
temperature stability ·
the
scalability ·
the
compactness (inversely proportional to the number of ports).
Switches that are based on
different technologies have essentially different limiting opportunities in
which to realize their characteristics. For example, thermo-optical
switches have
a switching time
limited to a few milliseconds. Acousto-optical
and electro-mechanical
switches are limited to microseconds.
Switches
that use integrated optics operate from milliseconds
to microseconds.
Electro-optical
switches operate from microseconds
to nanoseconds (depending on the material
used; for LiNbO3,
nanoseconds). Switches
in optical semi-conductor amplifiers operate in nanoseconds. Except for integrated optics technology and electro-mechanical
technology (MEMS, Micro-Electro-Mechanical Switches), all others have not yet
achieved sufficient potential for creating a device with many switched optical
paths. Now, technical realization of MEMS with many ports is more advanced
than switches using integrated optics. This technology can potentially create
switching matrixes with 1000 ports. MEMS-technology also promises small losses
and compactness of the switching matrix. Even though this technology does not
provide realization of all requirements, MEMS seem to be the preferable
candidate for application in all-optical switches.
The Optical Carrier Generator
One of the major
parameters determining throughput capacity of a WDM network is the number of
wavelength carriers. If traditional laser diodes with stable
wavelength are used as a source of optical
radiation, the quantity of
OLSPs on one path is limited to
approximately two hundred wavelength
carriers. That is because
using many lasers
with different wavelengths greatly raises the
system's
price. Simultaneously
to generating many
wavelength carriers,
using one source is extremely useful in the technology of optical networks.
Along with significant reduction of system cost, the mutual drift of the
frequency of the carriers
greatly decreases.
Such generators are made using
supercontinuum
sources.
To generate supercontinuum
radiation means forming
a wide and continuous spectrum when
powerful light pulses pass through a nonlinear
medium. The
term supercontinuum is not connected to the specific phenomenon, but
rather
there are a lot of nonlinear effects, which in
combination generate superextension
of the pulse
spectrum. The nonlinear effects
participating in spectral extension
strongly depend on the
dispersion
of the nonlinear
medium. Reasonable
chosen dispersion
can essentially lower the requirements for
the power of the
pulse. The widest spectrum results from the propagation
of an inoculating
pulse with a wavelength close to the wavelength
of zero-dispersion
of a nonlinear medium.
The supercontinuum
source of radiation gives a wide spectrum
with high brightness. Such a combination of
features is not given by other technologies.
Formation
a spectrum of supercontinuum
is more effective on fibers with strong nonlinearity, in particular, on
conical fibers
and photonic crystal fibers.
Crystal fibers
consist of a quartz core
surrounded by a cladding
with a set of air micro-channels going along the fiber. The structure
provides, dependent on wavelength, an effective index
of refraction for the cladding
and allows the fiber to pass one mode
in the visible
and in the near
infrared spectrum. Varying the arrangement and sizes of the air
micro-channels, the fiber dispersion
can be adjusted over a wide range, and the effective area of the
propagating mode can be adapted to increase the
non-linearity of the
fiber. The
combination of
unique dispersion and
increased non-linearity can be used for effective generation
of supercontinuum radiation. An example layout
of a
multiwave generator of optical
carriers
that use a supercontinuum source of radiation is presented
in Figure 3.
Figure
3.
The radiation from the laser (1),
generating powerful short pulses, is entered in a fiber (2) with strong
nonlinearity. The multibandwidth
optical filter (3) is applied to the fiber’s output. The
results of each output of the generator’s
elements are shown
schematically below. Within Figure 3, (a) illustrates radiation of the laser
as a sequence of
short pulses of a certain wavelength and
duration, following the certain frequency, for example, f0. At (b)
it is visible. Each pulse on the
output of the
nonlinear fiber is transformed and represents a supercontinuum spectrum. If
the pass-band of the filter (3) is chosen smaller than the frequency of the
repetition pulses f0, the radiation at the
filter output (c) will consist of continuous optical carriers,
whose quantity depends on the filter.
The mutual stability of
these optical carriers is much greater than those using a huge quantity
of laser diodes
with stabilized wavelengths,
since the stability of the filter is one
order of magnitude
higher than that of
laser diodes. This
reduces the probability of errors
in transfer of information or (if needed)
reduces the frequency
interval between the optical
carriers.
That enables, in particular, an increase in the
quantity of carriers.
Intervals between the carriers
today are
up to 10 GHz,
which allows the optical carrier generator to provide more than 1000 channels
each with a speed of transfer of 2.5 Gbit/s.
These examples of technical
solutions of base elements, which will be used in the new generation of
communication networks (all-optical networks), do not exhaust the problems
and difficulties. Despite considerable successes, much work is necessary
to find an acceptable door to success. The complexity of finding the
solutions to this large problem is aggravated because in photonics there
are not yet established technical solutions, as there are in electronics
on which modern communication systems are based. The efforts made for the
solution of these problems nevertheless are not a guarantee of their
success in the near future. It is possible that extraordinary solutions
will be found and future communication networks will be essentially
different from what we now imagine. But, we can expect that the optical
networks of the coming years will be networks “IP over WDM”, i.e., IP
and WDM technologies will be widely used. |
||
|
Copyright © 2007 Fiber Optic Communication Solutions. All rights reserved. |
|||